Never, it seems, has IP creation and invention ever been so concerned about their relationship to technology. For sure, copyright has always been dragged along by advances in the means of reproduction and distribution, from the printing press to the digital file. And, for sure, the metes and bounds of patent protection have always wrestled with scientific and technology developments.
Ultimately, all these encounters have been about accommodation. As embodied in AI, however, accommodation is increasingly sharing the stage with a brooding sense of threat: will AI, and the algorithms that form it, ultimately replace the human being as the agent of creation and invention.
Against this background, it is worth recalling how two approaches from over a century ago, one looking backward (the “Arts and Crafts Movement”), and the other embracing tomorrow (“the Futurist’s Manifesto”), sought to address the problem in the context of their time, responding to what the English author, Thomas Hardy, called the “ache of modernism”.
https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/03/technologys-challenge-to-autonomous.html
Tekoäly muuttaa luomisprosessia.
So, for Morris, production by the machine was “altogether an evil”. Actually, not quite. In fact, Morris was prepared to commission work from manufacturers who standards satisfied Morris, even if the production was machine-based. As observed by Fiona MacCarthy—
https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2021/03/technologys-challenge-to-autonomous.html
Teknologian kykyyn luoda liittyy myös tunneasioita. Mikä on ihmisen rooli tulevaisuudessa?
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti